|
|
CATEGORY |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Conclusion
(Organization) |
There is no clear
conclusion, the thesis is ignored, and the paper just ends. |
The conclusion is
recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends, and generally ignores
the thesis. |
The conclusion is
recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends, and generally supports
the thesis. |
The conclusion is
strong, supports the thesis and leaves the reader with a feeling that they
understand what the writer is "getting at." |
|
Flow & Rhythm
(Sentence Fluency) |
The sentences are
difficult to read aloud because they sound awkward, are distractingly
repetitive, or difficult to understand. |
Most sentences sound
natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but several are stiff and
awkward or are difficult to understand. |
Almost all sentences
sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are stiff
and awkward or difficult to understand. |
All sentences sound
natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and
has an obvious emphasis. |
|
Grammar &
Spelling (Conventions) |
Writer makes more than 4
errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes 3-4 errors
in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes 1-2 errors
in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes no errors
in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
|
Support for Topic
(Content) |
Supporting details and
information are typically unclear or not relevant to thesis. |
Supporting details and
information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the thesis
are unsupported. |
Supporting details and
information are relevant, but lack a solid connection with the thesis. |
Relevant, telling,
quality details that fully support the thesis and give the reader important
information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. |
|
Introduction
(Organization) |
There is no clear
introduction of the thesis or structure of the paper. |
The introduction states
the thesis, yet is ambiguous, and does not adequately preview the structure
of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. |
The introduction states
the thesis and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly
inviting to the reader. |
The introduction is
inviting, clearly states a solid thesis and previews the structure of the
paper. |