|
|
CATEGORY |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Penmanship
(Conventions) |
Many words are
unreadable OR there are several distracting corrections. |
The writing is
generally readable, but the reader has to exert quite a bit of effort to
figure out some of the words. |
Paper is neatly written
or typed with 1 or 2 distracting corrections (e.g., dark cross-outs; bumpy
white-out, words written over). |
Paper is neatly written
or typed with no distracting corrections. |
|
Grammar &
Spelling (Conventions) |
Writer makes more than
4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes 3-4 errors
in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes 1-2 errors
in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Writer makes no errors
in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
|
Word Choice |
Writer uses a limited
vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or captures the reader's
interest. Jargon or clichés may be present and detract from the meaning. |
Writer uses words that
communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair. |
Writer uses vivid words
and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but
occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone. |
Writer uses vivid words
and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice
and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced. |
|
Capitalization
& Punctuation (Conventions) |
Writer makes several
errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention
and greatly interrupt the flow. |
Writer makes a few
errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention
and interrupt the flow. |
Writer makes 1 or 2
errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read.
|
Writer makes no errors
in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read.
|
|
Conclusion
(Organization) |
There is no clear
conclusion, the paper just ends. |
The conclusion is
recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends. |
The conclusion is
recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends. |
The conclusion is
strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the
writer is "getting at." |
|
Focus on Topic
(Content) |
The main idea is not
clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. |
Main idea is somewhat
clear but there is a need for more supporting information. |
Main idea is clear but
the supporting information is general. |
There is one clear,
well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed
information. |
|
Support for Topic
(Content) |
Supporting details and
information are typically unclear or not related to the topic. |
Supporting details and
information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline
are unsupported. |
Supporting details and
information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is
unsupported. |
Relevant, telling,
quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the
obvious or predictable. |
|
Introduction
(Organization) |
There is no clear
introduction of the main idea or details. |
The introduction states
the main topic, but does not clearly state details nor is it particularly
inviting to the reader. |
The introduction
clearly states the main idea and 2 details about the topic, but it is not
particularly inviting to the reader. |
The introduction is
inviting to the reader. It clearly states the main idea and 2 details about
the topic. |